ARTICLE
THIRTEEN
NIGERIAN
UNITY:TO BE OR NOT TO BE.
When
it comes to the problem of Nigeria’s unity, everyone has an opinion. On the
whole that is a good thing as it shows that the everyone, from the pepper and
ewedu seller in the open market to the chief executive in his air-conditioned
office, cares about the fate of our nation. But the problem is that there is a
mind-bending paradox inherent in the way Nigerians discuss the unity of our
country. On the one hand, Nigerians are unanimous in their view that the
problems of Nigeria are not simple. They are complex and numerous: staggering
unemployment, endemic corruption,
soaring inflation, alarming insecurity, etc. On the other hand, these people
are equally unanimous in proferring simple answers to these complex problems.
You hear things like the money-loving igbos are the bane of the country, or the
duplicitous Yorubas are the ones standing in the way of Nigerian unity, or the
parasitic north is the problem of Nigeria. And you meet people who believe that
putting one of their own in power is the only way forward for the country.
As for me, I
can only marvel at the clarity most people seem to have achieved on the
Nigerian question. I get lost in the labyrinth of ssues surrounding the thorny
question before I can ever make it to the answer. When I’m asked for the answer
to the problem of Nigeria’s unity, I can only fidget and stammer and confess my
helplessness in the face of such a daunting task. I do not have quick one-line
answers ready about how it’s all the fault of the Niger-deltans for not
developing their land with the generous allocation to them from the federal
government, or how all the indices show that the north does contributes exactly
nothing to our economy.
To start
with, I confess that I’m not sure if Nigeria should even remain one nation at
all. No, I’m not an ethnic jingoist, nor do I believe that all the problems
that plaque Nigeria will vanish with the country, instead of tainting the
fruits that it would bear. It’s hard to imagine how dismantling Nigeria alone
can suddenly stave off corruption in Oyo state or tackle unemployment in Lagos
state. The tragic precedent everywhere in sub-saharan Africa has been for the
new states to carry on in the style of the parent state. But I can still see
some merits in the arguments that have been made against one Nigeria.
Foremost in
my mind are the millions of lives that have been lost to the Nigerian
experiment, as if Nigeria was the macabre project of some NAZI mad scientist.
Even before we got our independence from the colonial overlords, Nigerians were
already killing Nigerians in the thousands because they coudnt settle on an
amicable way to live together. Barely six to seven years after independence the
groups that make up Nigeria were caught in a gruesome bloodbath , starting in
1966 when tens of thousand of Igbo Nigerians were brutally murdered in the
north by their Hausa Nigerian neighbours
and ending in 1970 when no less than 3 million Nigerians had died so the country could
remain one. Showing a disturbing lack of capacity to learn from history, the
pages of Nigeria’s history since then have remained stained and blotted with
the blood of the innocent. Even in 2018, the orgy of mindless slaughter has
commenced with the dastardly activities of the herdsmen. The question on my
mind is: why do we even bother? The senseless killings that litter the history
of this nation can only indicate that we have no desire to learn to live
together. Every election is always the same with the threat of violence hanging
in the air. If decades of living together has not made us more acceptable to
each other, then what is stopping us from calling it quits. Those of us who
shout one Nigeria or nothing, are we not been misled by politicians who want 4o
keep Nigeria one for their own purpose when they have no intention of doing the
things that will help us live together. I know it is important to make
sacrifices, but the nigerian case appears to be like human sacrifices made
before a falsegod who can do nothing to help its followers. Proponents of one
Nigeria need to do some soul searching to discover why they want Nigeria to
remain one and if it is worth the lives of the millions who have died so
Nigeria could learn nothing And the millions who continue to die as we make the same mistakes.
The second
argument that resonates with me regarding the Nigerian question is premised on
the principles of individual freedom and independence. I fiercely believe that
every group should have the freedom to determine their fate and to which
country they’ll belong. The situation in Nigeria now can be likened to a tenant
who wants to keep other tenant at the house with himself at gun point. If
Nigeria is the choice you have made for yourself, I believe you should give
your compatriots the opportunity to make their own choices. Indeed, a large
part of our problems in Nigeria stems from the fact that we have been unable to
come together to negotiate an equitable basis for our existence,to first decide
if we want to be a country and then to determine the terms upon which we want
to live. This principle of choice accords with natural law an d anyone who is
denied is limitation to this argument is how large the group has to be before
their right to autonomy is recognised. For example, what happens if millions of
Yorubas in the negotiating table bound to be restless and to attempt to upset
the status quo.
Comments
Post a Comment